12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Aantal tests
14
17
23
Best position
#3
#2
#1
Average position
16.0
5.9
2.3
Laatste test
2020
2018
2021
Beschikbare maten
66
91
76

Prestatievergelijking

Gemiddeld uit 2 tests

Natte prestaties
Firestone Winterhawk 3
66%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin Alpin 5
78%
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Michelin Alpin 5
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Winterhawk 3
57%
Michelin Alpin 5
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Winterhawk 3
60%
Michelin Alpin 5
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Aquaplaning longitudinaal
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Michelin Alpin 5
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
93%
Aquaplaning transversaal
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Michelin Alpin 5
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Droge prestaties
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin Alpin 5
84%
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental WinterContact TS 860
81%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Droogremmen
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin Alpin 5
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
81%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin Alpin 5
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
81%
Sneeuwprestaties
Firestone Winterhawk 3
84%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin Alpin 5
72%
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Remmen op sneeuw
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
Michelin Alpin 5
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Tractie op sneeuw
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Michelin Alpin 5
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Sneeuwverwerking
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Michelin Alpin 5
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
Michelin Alpin 5
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Prestaties op ijs
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin Alpin 5
76%
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Remmen op ijs met abs
Firestone Winterhawk 3
78%
Michelin Alpin 5
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Michelin Alpin 5
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
74%
Comfort & geluid
Firestone Winterhawk 3
73%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin Alpin 5
75%
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Exterieurgeluid
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Michelin Alpin 5
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
73%
Interieurgeluid
Firestone Winterhawk 3
77%
Michelin Alpin 5
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
Rijcomfort
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Michelin Alpin 5
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
97%
Economie
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin Alpin 5
77%
Michelin
Alpin 5
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Rolweerstand
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Michelin Alpin 5
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Firestone Winterhawk 3
89%
Michelin Alpin 5
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Kilometrage
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Michelin Alpin 5
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
70%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2018195/65 R15Bekijk
ADACADAC
Winter
2017195/65 R15Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking