Vergelijking: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 3

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Winterhawk 3

R13 – R18

VS

Premie

Continental

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Winterhawk 3

WinterContact TS 860

MS plus 77

Polaris 3

Aantal tests

14

23

19

10

Best position

#3

#1

#3

Average position

16.0

2.3

11.2

10.6

Laatste test

2020

2021

2018

Beschikbare maten

66

76

67

Prestatievergelijking

Natte prestaties

70%

Firestone

Winterhawk 3

91%

Continental

WinterContact TS 860

86%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

74%

Barum

Polaris 3

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Winterhawk 3

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

95%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

89%

Barum Polaris 3

84%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Winterhawk 3

55%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

92%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

87%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Winterhawk 3

63%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

89%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Aquaplaning longitudinaal

Firestone Winterhawk 3

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

92%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

87%

Barum Polaris 3

65%

Aquaplaning transversaal

Firestone Winterhawk 3

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Droge prestaties

76%

Firestone

Winterhawk 3

81%

Continental

WinterContact TS 860

74%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

79%

Barum

Polaris 3

Droogremmen

Firestone Winterhawk 3

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

81%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Droge behandeling

Firestone Winterhawk 3

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

81%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

76%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Sneeuwprestaties

85%

Firestone

Winterhawk 3

86%

Continental

WinterContact TS 860

85%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

88%

Barum

Polaris 3

Remmen op sneeuw

Firestone Winterhawk 3

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

92%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

87%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Tractie op sneeuw

Firestone Winterhawk 3

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Barum Polaris 3

89%

Sneeuwverwerking

Firestone Winterhawk 3

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel

Firestone Winterhawk 3

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

87%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Comfort & geluid

78%

Firestone

Winterhawk 3

93%

Continental

WinterContact TS 860

83%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

75%

Barum

Polaris 3

Exterieurgeluid

Firestone Winterhawk 3

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

89%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Rijcomfort

Firestone Winterhawk 3

71%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

97%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

87%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Economie

79%

Firestone

Winterhawk 3

82%

Continental

WinterContact TS 860

73%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

76%

Barum

Polaris 3

Rolweerstand

Firestone Winterhawk 3

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

84%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Barum Polaris 3

84%

Kilometrage

Firestone Winterhawk 3

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Barum Polaris 3

68%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
Autobild	Winter	2018	195/65 R15	Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Vergelijking: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 3

Winterhawk 3

WinterContact TS 860

MS plus 77

Polaris 3

Test profile

Prestatievergelijking

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking