12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Uniroyal RainSport 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Uniroyal
RainSport 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
21
15
4
28
Beste positie
#2
#3
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
16.1
3.3
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
165
136
40
68

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
48%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store