12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Aantal tests
21
13
29
24
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
4.3
3.7
2.7
Laatste test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
123
180
302

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Droog
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Soelaas
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Kosten
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store