12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
21
4
5
4
28
Beste positie
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
12.0
2.8
3.3
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
165
111
139
40
67
Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store