Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

P ZERO PZ4

Aantal tests

21

4

3

5

14

Beste positie

#2

#3

#2

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

11.9

12.0

3.3

2.2

5.5

Laatste test

2024

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

164

111

40

60

63

706

Nat

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Droog

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Droogremmen

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Droge behandeling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Kilometrage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Rolweerstand

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Prijs/waarde

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

28%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

P ZERO PZ4

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking