Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental SportContact 7

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofiel

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

SportContact 7

Aantal tests

21

4

3

15

Beste positie

#2

#3

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

11.9

12.0

3.3

1.2

Laatste test

2024

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

164

111

40

122

Nat

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Natte zijgeleiding

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental SportContact 7

80%

Droog

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental SportContact 7

91%

Droogremmen

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

97%

Droge behandeling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

94%

Droog rijgedrag

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Droge stuurrespons

Firestone Roadhawk

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental SportContact 7

78%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

Inwendig geluid

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental SportContact 7

80%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Rolweerstand

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Kilometrage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Brandstofefficiëntie

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental SportContact 7

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

SportContact 7

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking