12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Aantal tests
21
3
28
24
Beste positie
#2
#4
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
4.3
2.3
2.7
Laatste test
2024
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
99
68
302

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store