12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone RoadhawkBovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Continental PremiumContact 7Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
1 gemeenschappelijke test(s) met gedetailleerde gegevens
Vergelijk ook met
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
21
10
18
26
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
6.0
6.1
2.2
Laatste test
2024
2026
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
164
104
47
66

Prestatievergelijking

Natte prestaties
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
91%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning transversaal
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
57%
Continental PremiumContact 7
66%
Droge prestaties
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Comfort & geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
56%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Exterieurgeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Economie
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
AutobildAutobild
De zomer
2024205/55 R16Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking