Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraContact NXT

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Roadhawk

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraGrip Performance 3

Aantal tests

21

5

4

5

24

Beste positie

#2

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

11.9

2.8

3.3

2.2

2.7

Laatste test

2024

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

165

139

40

63

302

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

90%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

88%

Prestaties op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

24%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Droog

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Droogremmen

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Droge behandeling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Droog rijgedrag

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

100%

Prestaties op droog wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Droge stuurrespons

Firestone Roadhawk

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Inwendig geluid

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

97%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Kilometrage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

64%

Rolweerstand

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Prijs/waarde

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste banden voor elektrische voertuigen Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Roadhawk

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking