12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
21
1
24
28
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
1.0
2.7
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
165
66
302
68

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store