12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Aantal tests
21
1
28
4
5
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
1.0
2.3
3.3
2.2
Laatste test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
66
67
40
63

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store