Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Aantal tests

21

—

3

Beste positie

#2

—

#2

Gemiddelde positie

11.9

—

3.3

Laatste test

2024

—

2026

Beschikbare maten

164

123

40

60

Nat

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Droog

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Droogremmen

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Droge behandeling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Droog rijgedrag

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Inwendig geluid

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolweerstand

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Kilometrage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Prijs/waarde

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Brandstofefficiëntie

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking