Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofiel

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Aantal tests

21

—

3

1

5

Beste positie

#2

—

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

11.9

—

3.3

1.0

2.2

Laatste test

2024

—

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

164

123

40

64

63

Nat

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Droog

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droogremmen

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Droge behandeling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Droog rijgedrag

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Inwendig geluid

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kilometrage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Rolweerstand

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Prijs/waarde

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking