12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Aantal tests
21
14
29
Beste positie
#2
#8
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
13.4
3.7
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
123
153
180

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store