12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Aantal tests
21
4
3
24
5
Beste positie
#2
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
3.3
3.7
2.7
2.8
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
165
40
36
302
139

Nat

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking