12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Aantal tests
21
4
3
18
3
Beste positie
#2
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
3.3
3.7
6.1
1.3
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
165
40
36
47
23

Nat

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store