12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Dunlop
Winter
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Aantal tests
21
4
2
29
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
3.3
1.5
3.7
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
40
66
180

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store