12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Firestone RoadhawkBovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Continental WinterContact TS 870Premie
ContinentalContinental

WinterContact TS 870

9.9
R14 – R18
Bridgestone Turanza T005Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Turanza T005

8.8
R14 – R23
Vergelijk ook met
UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3) PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Aantal tests
21
4
17
33
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
3.3
1.7
4.1
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
40
80
658

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
88%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
VS
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro

Vergelijk ook

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.PrimacyContinental WinterContact TS 870 vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenDunlopGT

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store