12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Dunlop Winter

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Dunlop
Winter
Aantal tests
21
4
29
2
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
3.3
3.7
1.5
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
40
180
66

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Dunlop Winter
78%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Dunlop Winter
84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store