12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
Aantal tests
21
4
36
10
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
3.3
3.1
2.1
Laatste test
2024
2026
2023
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
40
303
195

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
96%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store