12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
21
5
28
4
3
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
2.2
2.3
3.3
3.7
Laatste test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
63
67
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store