12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone RoadhawkBovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremie
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
21
18
1
28
4
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
6.1
1.0
2.3
3.3
Laatste test
2024
2024
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
165
47
66
67
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best tyres for evsBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Vergelijk ook

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs BFGoodrich AdvantageGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store