12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
21
18
23
3
28
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
6.1
3.3
3.7
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2024
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
165
47
176
36
67

Nat

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking