12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Firestone RoadhawkBovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Continental PremiumContact 7Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook Ventus EvoPremie
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Vergelijk ook met
UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Aantal tests
21
18
28
4
5
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
6.1
2.3
3.3
2.8
Laatste test
2024
2024
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
165
47
67
40
139

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Vergelijk ook

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Bladeren op merk

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store