12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
21
18
28
4
3
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
6.1
2.3
3.3
3.7
Laatste test
2024
2024
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
47
67
40
36

Nat

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking