12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Aantal tests
21
6
10
Best position
#2
#6
#2
Average position
11.9
9.8
6.0
Laatste test
2024
2018
2026
Beschikbare maten
164
70
104

Nat

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking