12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Aantal tests
21
3
23
29
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
3.7
3.3
3.7
Laatste test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
36
176
180

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store