12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Aantal tests
21
28
1
4
5
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
2.3
1.0
3.3
2.2
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
165
67
66
40
63

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store