12 Shops · 123,162+ Products
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Firestone RoadhawkBovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 6Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
BFGoodrich AdvantageBovenmidden
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Aantal tests
21
36
18
14
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#8
Average position
11.9
3.1
6.1
13.4
Laatste test
2024
2023
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
164
296
47
153

Prestatievergelijking

Natte prestaties
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental PremiumContact 6
70%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich Advantage
62%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
51%
Aquaplaning longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Aquaplaning transversaal
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
60%
Droge prestaties
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
92%
Comfort & geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Exterieurgeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Rijcomfort
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
73%
Economie
Firestone Roadhawk
55%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental PremiumContact 6
70%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Continental PremiumContact 6
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
46%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
AutobildAutobild
De zomer
2021205/55 R16Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking