Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Testprofiel

Roadhawk

EcoContact 6

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Aantal tests

21

5

18

11

Beste positie

#2

#7

#1

Gemiddelde positie

11.9

13.0

6.1

11.6

Laatste test

2024

2022

2024

Beschikbare maten

164

676

47

121

Nat

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Natte zijgeleiding

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Droog

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Droogremmen

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Droge behandeling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Continental EcoContact 6

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Droog rijgedrag

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

Continental EcoContact 6

73%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

74%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Inwendig geluid

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Continental EcoContact 6

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

67%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Kilometrage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Continental EcoContact 6

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Rolweerstand

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Continental EcoContact 6

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Prijs/waarde

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Continental EcoContact 6

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Brandstofefficiëntie

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Continental EcoContact 6

99%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

89%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Wederzijdse tests

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
Autobild	De zomer	2022	215/55 R17	Bekijk

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Roadhawk

EcoContact 6

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Wederzijdse tests

Voeg toe aan vergelijking