12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
EcoContact 6
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
21
5
14
3
Beste positie
#2
#7
#8
#2
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
13.0
13.4
3.3
Laatste test
2024
2022
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
164
676
153
40

Nat

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Natte prestaties
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Droge prestaties
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking