12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
21
14
24
28
Beste positie
#2
#8
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.9
13.4
2.7
2.3
Laatste test
2024
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
165
153
302
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Natte zijgeleiding
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droog rijgedrag
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge stuurrespons
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Inwendig geluid
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store