12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Aantal tests
6
23
1
17
Beste positie
#3
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.7
3.3
1.0
1.7
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
146
176
66
80

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store