12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Aantal tests
6
24
4
29
Beste positie
#3
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.7
2.7
3.3
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
146
302
40
180

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store