12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
6
23
3
28
Beste positie
#3
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.7
3.3
3.7
2.3
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
146
123
176
36
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store