Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 vs. Dunlop Winter

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PILOT ALPIN 5

Winter

Aantal tests

6

—

3

21

2

Beste positie

#3

—

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

4.7

—

3.3

1.7

1.5

Laatste test

2026

—

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

146

123

40

133

65

Nat

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

72%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

60%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

69%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

74%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

86%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Natte prestaties

Firestone Roadhawk 2

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

83%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Droog

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

86%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Droogremmen

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

80%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Droge behandeling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

90%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Firestone Roadhawk 2

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

80%

Droge prestaties

Firestone Roadhawk 2

58%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

68%

Dunlop Winter

78%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

76%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rolweerstand

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

79%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Kilometrage

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

55%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

78%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

89%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 vs. Dunlop Winter

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PILOT ALPIN 5

Winter

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking