12 Shops · 123,162+ Products
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone Roadhawk 2Bovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
6
3
26
Best position
#3
#2
#1
Average position
4.7
3.3
2.2
Laatste test
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
146
40
66

Nat

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Natte prestaties
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge prestaties
Firestone Roadhawk 2
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Gezamenlijke testen beschikbaar
Deze banden zijn samen getest in 1 test(s). Klik om gedetailleerde onderlinge resultaten te bekijken.

Wederzijdse tests

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
ADACADAC
De zomer
2026225/50 R17Bekijk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking