12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Barum Polaris 6 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Barum
Polaris 6
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
6
4
3
28
Beste positie
#3
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.7
3.3
7.0
2.3
Laatste test
2026
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
146
40
99
68

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Barum Polaris 6
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Barum Polaris 6
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Barum Polaris 6
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Barum Polaris 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Barum Polaris 6
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Barum Polaris 6
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Barum Polaris 6
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Barum Polaris 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Barum Polaris 6
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Barum Polaris 6
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Barum Polaris 6
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Barum Polaris 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Barum Polaris 6
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Barum Polaris 6
94%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Barum Polaris 6
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Barum Polaris 6
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Barum Polaris 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Barum Polaris 6
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store