12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Firestone Roadhawk 2Bovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook Ventus EvoPremie
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
6
18
5
4
4
5
3
Beste positie
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
4.7
6.1
2.8
3.3
3.3
2.2
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2024
2026
2026
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
146
47
139
40
40
63
36

Nat

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Banden voor ev-auto'sBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Roadhawk 2 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcorunGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenDunlopGT

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking