Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Roadhawk 2

Tire Grabber GT Plus

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Aantal tests

6

2

3

1

Beste positie

#3

#9

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

4.7

9.0

3.3

1.0

Laatste test

2026

2023

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

146

64

40

64

Nat

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droog

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Droge behandeling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolweerstand

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometrage

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Roadhawk 2

Tire Grabber GT Plus

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking