12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Dunlop
Winter
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Aantal tests
6
2
23
Beste positie
#3
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.7
1.5
3.3
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
146
65
176

Nat

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Dunlop Winter
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Dunlop Winter
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Dunlop Winter
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Dunlop Winter
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking