12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Hankook ION Evo

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Hankook
ION Evo
Aantal tests
6
17
23
1
Beste positie
#3
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.7
1.7
3.3
1.0
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
146
80
176
66

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store