12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
6
17
23
14
Beste positie
#3
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.7
1.7
3.3
3.6
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
146
80
176
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store