12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Aantal tests
6
17
4
3
23
Beste positie
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.7
1.7
3.3
3.7
3.3
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
146
80
40
36
176

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store