12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Aantal tests
6
17
4
3
5
Beste positie
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.7
1.7
3.3
3.7
2.2
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
146
80
40
36
63

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store