12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
6
17
4
14
Beste positie
#3
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.7
1.7
3.3
3.6
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
146
80
40
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Droog
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droge behandeling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droogremmen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Soelaas
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store