Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Roadhawk 2

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Aantal tests

6

14

3

1

3

Beste positie

#3

#1

#2

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

4.7

3.6

3.3

1.0

3.7

Laatste test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

146

188

40

64

34

Nat

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Natte prestaties

Firestone Roadhawk 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Droog

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Droogremmen

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Droge behandeling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Firestone Roadhawk 2

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Droge prestaties

Firestone Roadhawk 2

58%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Soelaas

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolweerstand

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Prijs/waarde

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Kilometrage

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking