Vergelijking: Firestone Multiseason vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Bovenmidden

Firestone

Multiseason

R13 – R16

VS

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

8.0

R16 – R22

Vergelijk ook met

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Multiseason

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Aantal tests

2

10

6

Beste positie

#5

#2

#3

Gemiddelde positie

13.0

6.0

4.7

Laatste test

2018

2026

Beschikbare maten

26

104

146

Nat

Firestone Multiseason

52%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Firestone Multiseason

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Firestone Multiseason

40%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Firestone Multiseason

44%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Firestone Multiseason

29%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Firestone Multiseason

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Sneeuw

Firestone Multiseason

77%

Droog

Firestone Multiseason

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Droogremmen

Firestone Multiseason

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Soelaas

Firestone Multiseason

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Buitengeluid

Firestone Multiseason

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Kosten

Firestone Multiseason

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Kilometrage

Firestone Multiseason

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Firestone Multiseason vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Multiseason

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

Nat

Sneeuw

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking