12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Firestone Multiseason vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofiel

Firestone
Multiseason
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Aantal tests
2
5
10
Beste positie
#5
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
13.0
2.8
6.0
Laatste test
2018
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
26
139
109

Nat

Nat
Firestone Multiseason
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Firestone Multiseason
29%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Firestone Multiseason
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Firestone Multiseason
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Firestone Multiseason
40%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Firestone Multiseason
44%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%

Droog

Droog
Firestone Multiseason
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Droogremmen
Firestone Multiseason
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Firestone Multiseason
77%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Firestone Multiseason
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Buitengeluid
Firestone Multiseason
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multiseason
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Kilometrage
Firestone Multiseason
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking